🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves at risk from shoreline retreat state that indecision on how best to address the issue is creating avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Historic Graveyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer locations. Officials maintain it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His mother said she lost sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to think this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to handle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Some are calling for more sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to proceed for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. It requires productive local conversations to discover the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a theological perspective on the temporal loss of sacred ground.